123 lines
43 KiB
HTML
123 lines
43 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title>Blue Letter Bible: Text Commentaries</title>
|
|
<script src="../../../js/basepath.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
|
|
<script src="./js/nav.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
|
|
<script src="./js/MainHeader.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
|
|
<script type="text/javascript">
|
|
PriorBook = '2 Corinthians';
|
|
PriorBookURL = './Comm/jfb/2Cr/2Cr000.html';
|
|
PriorChapter = 'Galatians 2';
|
|
PriorChapterURL = './Comm/jfb/Gal/Gal002.html';
|
|
NextBook = 'Ephesians';
|
|
NextBookURL = './Comm/jfb/Eph/Eph000.html';
|
|
NextChapter = 'Galatians 4';
|
|
NextChapterURL = './Comm/jfb/Gal/Gal004.html';
|
|
Title = 'The Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Galatians';
|
|
SubTitle1 = 'Commentary by A. R. FAUSSET';
|
|
SubTitle2 = '';
|
|
SubTitle3 = 'CHAPTER 3';
|
|
SubTitle3Cased = 'Chapter 3';
|
|
Author = ' Jamieson, Fausset & Brown';
|
|
imageMasthead = 'jfb.gif';
|
|
authorCite = 'Robert Jamieson; A.R. Fausset; and David Brown';
|
|
</script>
|
|
<script src="./js/Comms/JFB.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
|
|
</head><body>
|
|
<p id="Chapter3" align="center">Commentary by A. R. FAUSSET<br>CHAPTER 3
|
|
<p id="Ga3_1"><a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,'1-29');">Gal 3:1-29</a>. REPROOF OF THE GALATIANS FOR ABANDONING FAITH FOR LEGALISM. JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH VINDICATED: THE LAW SHOWN TO BE SUBSEQUENT TO THE PROMISE: BELIEVERS ARE THE SPIRITUAL SEED OF ABRAHAM, WHO WAS JUSTIFIED BY FAITH. THE LAW WAS OUR SCHOOLMASTER TO BRING US TO CHRIST, THAT WE MIGHT BECOME CHILDREN OF GOD BY FAITH.
|
|
<p><b>1. that ye should not obey the truth</b>—omitted in the oldest manuscripts.
|
|
<br><br><b>bewitched</b>—fascinated you so that you have lost your wits. THEMISTIUS says the Galatians were naturally very acute in intellect. Hence, Paul wonders they could be so misled in this case.
|
|
<br><br><b>you</b>—emphatical. "You, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been graphically set forth (literally, <i>in writing,</i> namely, by vivid <i>portraiture</i> in preaching) among you, crucified" (so the sense and <i>Greek</i> order require rather than <i>English Version</i>). As Christ was "crucified," so ye ought to have been by faith "<i>crucified</i> with Christ," and so "dead to the law" (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',2,19,20);">Gal 2:19-20</a>). Reference to the "eyes" is appropriate, as <i>fascination</i> was supposed to be exercised through the eyes. The sight of Christ crucified ought to have been enough to counteract all fascination.
|
|
<p id="Ga3_2"><b>2.</b> "Was it by the works of the law that ye received the Spirit (manifested by outward miracles, <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,5);">Gal 3:5</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Mar',16,17);">Mar 16:17</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Hbr',2,4);">Hbr 2:4</a>; and by spiritual graces, <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,14);">Gal 3:14</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Gal',4,5,6);">Gal 4:5-6</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Eph',1,13);">Eph 1:13</a>), or by the hearing of faith?" The "only" implies, "I desire, omitting other arguments, to rest the question on <i>this alone</i>"; I who was your <i>teacher,</i> desire now to "learn" this one thing from you. The epithet "Holy" is not prefixed to "Spirit" because that epithet is a joyous one, whereas this Epistle is stern and reproving [BENGEL].
|
|
<br><br><b>hearing of faith</b>—Faith consists not in <i>working,</i> but in <i>receiving</i> (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',10,16,17);">Rom 10:16-17</a>).
|
|
<p id="Ga3_3"><b>3. begun</b>—the Christian life (<a onclick="return mV('Phl',1,6);">Phl 1:6</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>in the Spirit</b>—Not merely was Christ crucified "graphically set forth" in my preaching, but also "the Spirit" confirmed the word preached, by imparting His spiritual gifts. "Having thus begun" with the receiving His <i>spiritual</i> gifts, "are ye now <i>being</i> made perfect" (so the <i>Greek</i>), that is, are ye <i>seeking</i> to be made perfect with "fleshly" ordinances of the law? [ESTIUS]. Compare <a onclick="return mV('Rom',2,28);">Rom 2:28</a>; <a href= "#" onclick="return mV('Phl',3,3);">Phl 3:3</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Hbr',9,10);">Hbr 9:10</a>. Having begun in the Spirit, that is, the Holy Spirit ruling your spiritual life as its "essence and active principle" [ELLICOTT], in contrast to "the flesh," the element in which the law works [ALFORD]. Having begun your Christianity in the Spirit, that is, in the divine life that proceeds from faith, are ye seeking after something higher still (the perfecting of your Christianity) in the sensuous and the earthly, which cannot possibly elevate the inner life of the Spirit, namely, outward ceremonies? [NEANDER]. No doubt the Galatians thought that they were going more deeply into the Spirit; for the flesh may be easily mistaken for the Spirit, even by those who have made progress, unless they continue to maintain a pure faith [BENGEL].
|
|
<p id="Ga3_4"><b>4. Have ye suffered so many things</b>—namely, persecution from Jews and from unbelieving fellow countrymen, incited by the Jews, at the time of your conversion.
|
|
<br><br><b>in vain</b>—<i>fruitlessly, needlessly,</i> since ye might have avoided them by professing Judaism [GROTIUS]. Or, shall ye, by falling from grace, lose the reward promised for all your sufferings, so that they shall be "in vain" (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',4,11);">Gal 4:11</a>; <a onclick="return mV('1Cr',15,2,'17-19','29-32');">1Cr 15:2, 17-19, 29-32</a>; <a onclick="return mV('2Th',1,'5-7');">2Th 1:5-7</a>; <a onclick="return mV('2Jo',1,8);">2Jo 1:8</a>)?
|
|
<br><br><b>yet</b>—rather, "If it be <i>really</i> (or 'indeed') in vain" [ELLICOTT]. "If, as it must be, what I have said, 'in vain,' is really the fact" [ALFORD]. I prefer understanding it as a mitigation of the preceding words. I hope better things of you, for I trust you will return from legalism to grace; if <i>so,</i> as I confidently expect, you will not have "suffered so many things in vain" [ESTIUS]. For "God has given you the Spirit and has wrought mighty works among you" (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,5);">Gal 3:5</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Hbr',10,'32-36');">Hbr 10:32-36</a>) [BENGEL].
|
|
<p id="Ga3_5"><b>5. He...that ministereth</b>—or "supplieth," God (<a onclick="return mV('2Cr',9,10);">2Cr 9:10</a>). He who <i>supplied and supplies</i> to you the Spirit <i>still,</i> to the present time. These miracles do not prove grace to be in the heart (<a onclick="return mV('Mar',9,38,39);">Mar 9:38-39</a>,). He speaks of these miracles as a matter of <i>unquestioned notoriety</i> among those addressed; an undesigned proof of their genuineness (compare <a onclick="return mV('1Cr',12,'1-31');">1Cr 12:1-31</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>worketh miracles among you</b>—rather, "IN you," as <a onclick="return mV('Gal',2,8);">Gal 2:8</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Mat',14,2);">Mat 14:2</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Eph',2,2);">Eph 2:2</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Phl',2,13);">Phl 2:13</a>; at your conversion and since [ALFORD].
|
|
<br><br><b>doeth he it by the works of the law</b>—that is, as a consequence <i>resulting from</i> (so the <i>Greek</i>) the works of the law (compare <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,2);">Gal 3:2</a>). This cannot be because the law was then unknown to you when you received those gifts of the Spirit.
|
|
<p id="Ga3_6"><b>6.</b> The answer to the question in <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,5);">Gal 3:5</a> is here taken for granted, <i>It was by the hearing of faith:</i> following this up, he says, "Even as Abraham <i>believed,</i>" etc. (<a onclick="return mV('Gen',15,'4-6');">Gen 15:4-6</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Rom',4,3);">Rom 4:3</a>). God supplies unto you the Spirit as the result of faith, not works, just as Abraham obtained justification by faith, not by works (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,6,8,16);">Gal 3:6, 8, 16</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Gal',4,22,26,28);">Gal 4:22, 26, 28</a>). Where justification is, there the Spirit is, so that if the former comes <i>by faith,</i> the latter must also.
|
|
<p id="Ga3_7"><b>7. they which are of faith</b>—as the source and starting-point of their spiritual life. The same phrase is in the <i>Greek</i> of <a href= "#" onclick="return mV('Rom',3,26);">Rom 3:26</a>.
|
|
<br><br><b>the same</b>—<i>these, and these alone,</i> to the exclusion of all the other descendants of Abraham.
|
|
<br><br><b>children</b>—<i>Greek,</i> "sons" (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,29);">Gal 3:29</a>).
|
|
<p id="Ga3_8"><b>8. And</b>—<i>Greek,</i> "Moreover."
|
|
<br><br><b>foreseeing</b>—One great excellency of Scripture is, that in it all points liable ever to be controverted, are, with prescient wisdom, decided in the most appropriate language.
|
|
<br><br><b>would justify</b>—rather, "justifieth." Present indicative. It is now, and at all times, God's <i>one</i> way of justification.
|
|
<br><br><b>the heathen</b>—rather, "the Gentiles"; or "the nations," as the same <i>Greek</i> is translated at the end of the verse. God justifieth the <i>Jews,</i> too, "by faith, not by works." But he specifies <i>the Gentiles</i> in particular here, as it was <i>their</i> case that was in question, the Galatians being Gentiles.
|
|
<br><br><b>preached before the gospel</b>—"announced beforehand the Gospel." For the "promise" was substantially the Gospel by anticipation. Compare <a onclick="return mV('Jhn',8,56);">Jhn 8:56</a> <a onclick="return mV('Hbr',4,2);">Hbr 4:2</a>. A proof that "the old fathers did not look only for transitory promises" [Article VII, Church of England]. Thus the Gospel, in its essential germ, is older than the law though the full development of the former is subsequent to the latter.
|
|
<br><br><b>In thee</b>—not "in thy seed," which is a point not here raised; but strictly "in thee," as followers of thy faith, it having first shown the way to justification before God [ALFORD]; or "in thee," as Father of the promised seed, namely, Christ (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,16);">Gal 3:16</a>), who is the Object of faith (<a onclick="return mV('Gen',22,18);">Gen 22:18</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Psa',72,17);">Psa 72:17</a>), and imitating thy faith (see on JFB for <a href="./Comm/jfb/Gal/Gal003.html#Ga3_9">Gal 3:9</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>all nations</b>—or as above, "all <i>the Gentiles</i>" (<a onclick="return mV('Gen',12,3);">Gen 12:3</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Gen',18,18);">18:18</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Gen',22,18);">22:18</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>be blessed</b>—an act of grace, not something earned by works. The blessing of justification was to Abraham by faith in the promise, not by works. So to those who follow Abraham, the father of the faithful, the blessing, that is, justification, comes purely by faith in Him who is the subject of the promise.
|
|
<p id="Ga3_9"><b>9. they</b>—and they alone.
|
|
<br><br><b>of faith</b>—(See on JFB for <a href="./Comm/jfb/Gal/Gal003.html#Ga3_7">Gal 3:7</a>, beginning).
|
|
<br><br><b>with</b>—together with.
|
|
<br><br><b>faithful</b>—implying what it is in which they are "blessed together with him," namely, faith, the prominent feature of his character, and of which the result to all who like him have it, is justification.
|
|
<p id="Ga3_10"><b>10.</b> Confirmation of <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,9);">Gal 3:9</a>. They who depend on the works of the law cannot share the blessing, for they are under the curse "written," <a onclick="return mV('Deu',27,26);">Deu 27:26</a>, <i>Septuagint.</i> PERFECT <i>obedience</i> is required by the words, "in all things." CONTINUAL <i>obedience</i> by the word, "continueth." No man renders this obedience (compare <a onclick="return mV('Rom',3,19,20);">Rom 3:19-20</a>). It is observable, Paul quotes Scripture to the Jews who were conversant with it, as in Epistle to the Hebrews, as <i>said</i> or <i>spoken;</i> but to the Gentiles, as <i>written.</i> So Matthew, writing for Jews, quotes it as "said," or "spoken"; Mark and Luke, writing for Gentiles, as "written" (<a onclick="return mV('Mat',1,22);">Mat 1:22</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Mar',1,2);">Mar 1:2</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Luk',2,22,23);">Luk 2:22-23</a>) [TOWNSON].
|
|
<p id="Ga3_11"><b>11. by the law</b>—<i>Greek,</i> "IN the law." Both <i>in</i> and <i>by</i> are included. The syllogism in this verse and <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,12);">Gal 3:12</a>, is, according to Scripture, "The just shall live by faith." But the law is not of faith, but of doing, or works (that is, does not make faith, but works, the conditional ground of justifying). Therefore "in," or "by the law, no man is justified before God" (whatever the case may be <i>before men,</i> <a onclick="return mV('Rom',4,2);">Rom 4:2</a>) —not even if he could, which he cannot, keep the law, because the Scripture element and conditional mean of justification is <i>faith.</i>
|
|
<br><br><b>The just shall live by faith</b>— (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',1,17);">Rom 1:17</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Hab',2,4);">Hab 2:4</a>). Not as BENGEL and ALFORD, "He who is just by faith shall live." The <i>Greek</i> supports <i>English Version.</i> Also the contrast is between "live <i>by faith</i>" (namely, as the ground and source of his justification), and "live <i>in them,</i>" namely, in his doings or works (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,12);">Gal 3:12</a>), as the <i>conditional element wherein</i> he is justified.
|
|
<p id="Ga3_12"><b>12. doeth</b>—Many depended on the law although they did not keep it; but without doing, saith Paul, it is of no use to them (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',2,13,17, 23);">Rom 2:13, 17, 23</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Rom',10,5);">10:5</a>).
|
|
<p id="Ga3_13"><b>13.</b> Abrupt exclamation, as he breaks away impatiently <i>from</i> those who would involve us again in the curse of the <i>law,</i> by seeking justification in it, <i>to</i> "<i>Christ,</i>" who "has redeemed us from its curse." The "us" refers primarily to the Jews, to whom the law principally appertained, in contrast to "the Gentiles" (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,14);">Gal 3:14</a>; compare <a onclick="return mV('Gal',4,3,4);">Gal 4:3-4</a>). But it is not <i>restricted</i> solely to the Jews, as ALFORD thinks; for these are the representative people of the world at large, and their "law" is the embodiment of what God requires of the whole world. The curse of its non-fulfilment affects the Gentiles through the Jews; for the law represents that righteousness which God requires of all, and which, since the Jews failed to fulfil, the Gentiles are equally unable to fulfil. <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,10);">Gal 3:10</a>, "As many as are of the works of the law, are under the curse," refers plainly, not to <i>the Jews only,</i> but to all, even Gentiles (as the Galatians), who seek justification by the law. The Jews' law represents the universal law which condemned the Gentiles, though with less clear consciousness on their part (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',2,'1-29');">Rom 2:1-29</a>). The revelation of God's "wrath" by the law of conscience, in some degree prepared the Gentiles for appreciating redemption through Christ when revealed. The curse had to be removed from off the heathen, too, as well as the Jews, in order that the blessing, through Abraham, might flow to them. Accordingly, the "we," in "that <i>we</i> might receive the promise of the Spirit," plainly refers to both Jews and Gentiles.
|
|
<br><br><b>redeemed us</b>—<i>bought us off</i> from our former bondage (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',4,5);">Gal 4:5</a>), and "from the curse" under which all lie who trust to the law and the works of the law for justification. The Gentile Galatians, by putting themselves under the law, were involving themselves in the curse from which Christ has redeemed the Jews primarily, and through them the Gentiles. The ransom price He paid was His own precious blood (<a onclick="return mV('1Pe',1,18,19);">1Pe 1:18-19</a>; compare <a onclick="return mV('Mat',20,28);">Mat 20:28</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Act',20,28);">Act 20:28</a>; <a onclick="return mV('1Cr',6,20);">1Cr 6:20</a>; <a onclick="return mV('1Cr',7,23);">7:23</a>; <a onclick="return mV('1Ti',2,6);">1Ti 2:6</a>; <a onclick="return mV('2Pe',2,1);">2Pe 2:1</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Rev',5,9);">Rev 5:9</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>being made</b>—<i>Greek,</i> "having become."
|
|
<br><br><b>a curse for us</b>—Having become what we were, <i>in our behalf,</i> "a curse," that we might cease to be a curse. Not merely <i>accursed</i> (in the concrete), but <i>a curse</i> in the abstract, <i>bearing the universal curse of the whole human race.</i> So <a onclick="return mV('2Cr',5,21);">2Cr 5:21</a>, "Sin for us," not <i>sinful,</i> but bearing the whole sin of our race, regarded as <i>one</i> vast aggregate of sin. See Note there. "Anathema" means "set apart to God," to His glory, but to the person's own destruction. "<i>Curse,</i>" an execration.
|
|
<br><br><b>written</b>— (<a onclick="return mV('Deu',21,23);">Deu 21:23</a>). Christ's bearing the <i>particular</i> curse of hanging on the tree, is a sample of the "general" curse which He representatively bore. Not that the Jews put to death malefactors by hanging; but <i>after</i> having put them to death otherwise, in order to brand them with peculiar ignominy, they <i>hung</i> the bodies on a tree, and such malefactors were accursed by the law (compare <a onclick="return mV('Act',5,30);">Act 5:30</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Act',10,39);">10:39</a>). God's providence ordered it so that to fulfil the prophecy of the curse and other prophecies, Jesus should be crucified, and so <i>hang</i> on the tree, though that death was not a Jewish mode of execution. The Jews accordingly, in contempt, call Him <i>Tolvi,</i> "the <i>hanged</i> one," and Christians, "worshippers of the hanged one"; and make it their great objection that He died the accursed death [TRYPHO, in <i>Justin Martyr,</i> p. 249] (<a onclick="return mV('1Pe',2,24);">1Pe 2:24</a>). Hung between heaven and earth as though unworthy of either!
|
|
<p id="Ga3_14"><b>14.</b> The intent of "Christ becoming a curse for us"; "To the end that upon the Gentiles the blessing of Abraham (that is, <i>promised to</i> Abraham, namely, justification by faith) might come in Christ Jesus" (compare <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,8);">Gal 3:8</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>that we might receive the promise of the Spirit</b>—the promised Spirit (<a onclick="return mV('Joe',2,28,29);">Joe 2:28-29</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Luk',24,49);">Luk 24:49</a>). This clause follows not the clause immediately preceding (for <i>our receiving the Spirit</i> is not the result of the <i>blessing of Abraham coming on the Gentiles</i>), but "Christ hath redeemed us," etc.
|
|
<br><br><b>through faith</b>—not by works. Here he resumes the thought in <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,2);">Gal 3:2</a>. "The Spirit from without, kindles within us some spark of faith Whereby we lay hold of Christ, and even of the Spirit Himself, that He may dwell within us" [FLACIUS].
|
|
<p id="Ga3_15"><b>15. I speak after the manner of men</b>—I take an illustration from a merely human transaction of everyday occurrence.
|
|
<br><br><b>but a man's covenant</b>—whose purpose it is far less important to maintain.
|
|
<br><br><b>if it be confirmed</b>—when once it hath been ratified.
|
|
<br><br><b>no man disannulleth</b>—"none setteth aside," not even the author himself, much less any second party. None does so who acts in common equity. Much less would the righteous God do so. <i>The law</i> is here, by personification, regarded as a second person, distinct from, and subsequent to, <i>the promise of God. The promise</i> is everlasting, and more peculiarly belongs to God. <i>The law</i> is regarded as something extraneous, afterwards introduced, exceptional and temporary (<a href= "#" onclick="return mV('Gal',3,'17-19','21-24');">Gal 3:17-19, 21-24</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>addeth</b>—None addeth new conditions "making" the covenant "of none effect" (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,17);">Gal 3:17</a>). So legal Judaism could make no alteration in the fundamental relation between God and man, already established by the promises to Abraham; it could not add as a new condition the observance of the law, in which case the fulfilment of the promise would be attached to a condition impossible for man to perform. The "covenant" here is one of free grace, a <i>promise</i> afterwards carried into effect in the Gospel.
|
|
<p id="Ga3_16"><b>16.</b> This verse is parenthetical. The covenant of promise was not "spoken" (so <i>Greek</i> for "made") to Abraham alone, but "to Abraham and his seed"; to the latter especially; and this means Christ (and that which is inseparable from Him, the <i>literal Israel,</i> and <i>the spiritual,</i> His body, the Church). Christ not having come when the law was given, the covenant could not have been then fulfilled, but awaited the coming of Him, the Seed, to whom it was spoken.
|
|
<br><br><b>promises</b>—plural, because the same promise was often repeated (<a onclick="return mV('Gen',12,3,7);">Gen 12:3, 7</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Gen',15,5,18);">15:5, 18</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Gen',17,7);">17:7</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Gen',22,18);">22:18</a>), and because it involved many things; earthly blessings to the literal children of Abraham in Canaan, and spiritual and heavenly blessings to his spiritual children; but both promised to Christ, "the Seed" and representative Head of the literal and spiritual Israel alike. In the spiritual seed there is no distinction of Jew or <i>Greek;</i> but to the literal seed, the promises still in part remain to be fulfilled (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',11,26);">Rom 11:26</a>). The covenant was not made with "many" seeds (which if there had been, a pretext might exist for supposing there was one seed before the law, another under the law; and that those sprung from one seed, say the Jewish, are admitted on different terms, and with a higher degree of acceptability, than those sprung from the Gentile seed), but with the one seed; therefore, the promise that in Him "all the families of the earth shall be blessed" (<a onclick="return mV('Gen',12,3);">Gen 12:3</a>), joins in this one Seed, Christ, Jew and Gentile, as fellow heirs on the same terms of acceptability, namely, by grace through faith (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',4,13);">Rom 4:13</a>); not to some by promise, to others by the law, but to all alike, circumcised and uncircumcised, constituting but one seed in Christ (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',4,16);">Rom 4:16</a>). The law, on the other hand, contemplates the Jews and Gentiles as distinct seeds. God makes a covenant, but it is one of promise; whereas the law is a covenant of works. Whereas the law brings in a mediator, a third party (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,19,20);">Gal 3:19-20</a>), God makes His covenant of promise with the one seed, Christ (<a onclick="return mV('Gen',17,7);">Gen 17:7</a>), and embraces others only as they are identified with, and represented by, Christ.
|
|
<br><br><b>one...Christ</b>—not in the exclusive sense, the man Christ <i>Jesus,</i> but "Christ" (<i>Jesus</i> is not added, which would limit the meaning), including <i>His people</i> who are <i>part of Himself,</i> the Second Adam, and Head of redeemed humanity. <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,28,29);">Gal 3:28-29</a> prove this, "Ye are all ONE in Christ Jesus" (Jesus is added here as the person is indicated). "And <i>if</i> ye be Christ's, ye are Abraham's SEED, heirs according to <i>the promise.</i>"
|
|
<p id="Ga3_17"><b>17. this I say</b>—"this is what I mean," by what I said in <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,15);">Gal 3:15</a>.
|
|
<br><br><b>continued...of God</b>—"ratified by God" (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,15);">Gal 3:15</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>in Christ</b>—rather, "unto Christ" (compare <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,16);">Gal 3:16</a>). However, <i>Vulgate</i> and the old Italian versions translate as <i>English Version.</i> But the oldest manuscripts omit the words altogether.
|
|
<br><br><b>the law which was</b>—<i>Greek,</i> "which came into existence four hundred thirty years after" (<a onclick="return mV('Exd',12,40,41);">Exd 12:40-41</a>). He does not, as in the case of "the covenant," add "enacted <i>by God</i>" (<a onclick="return mV('Jhn',1,17);">Jhn 1:17</a>). The dispensation of "the promise" began with the call of Abraham from Ur into Canaan, and ended on the last night of his grandson Jacob's sojourn in Canaan, the <i>land of promise.</i> The dispensation of the law, which engenders bondage, was beginning to draw on from the time of his entrance into Egypt, the land of bondage. It was to Christ in him, as in his grandfather Abraham, and his father Isaac, not to him or them as persons, the promise was spoken. On the day following the last repetition of the promise orally (<a onclick="return mV('Gen',46,'1-6');">Gen 46:1-6</a>), at Beer-sheba, Israel passed into Egypt. It is from the end, not from the beginning of the dispensation of promise, that the interval of four hundred thirty years between it and the law is to be counted. At Beer-sheba, after the covenant with Abimelech, Abraham called on the everlasting God, and the well was confirmed to him and his seed as an everlasting possession. Here God appeared to Isaac. Here Jacob received the promise of the blessing, for which God had called Abraham out of Ur, repeated for the last time, on the last night of his sojourn in the land of promise.
|
|
<br><br><b>cannot</b>—<i>Greek,</i> "doth not disannul."
|
|
<br><br><b>make...of none effect</b>—The promise would become so, if the power of conferring the inheritance be transferred from it to the law (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',4,14);">Rom 4:14</a>).
|
|
<p id="Ga3_18"><b>18. the inheritance</b>—all the blessings to be inherited by Abraham's literal and spiritual children, according to the promise made to him and to his Seed, Christ, justification and glorification (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',4,7);">Gal 4:7</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Rom',8,17);">Rom 8:17</a>; <a onclick="return mV('1Cr',6,9);">1Cr 6:9</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>but God,</b> etc.—The <i>Greek</i> order requires rather, "But to Abraham it was by promise that God hath given it." The conclusion is, <i>Therefore the inheritance is not of,</i> or <i>from the law</i> (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',4,14);">Rom 4:14</a>).
|
|
<p id="Ga3_19"><b>19.</b> "Wherefore then serveth the law?" as it is of no avail for justification, is it either useless, or contrary to the covenant of God? [CALVIN].
|
|
<br><br><b>added</b>—to the original covenant of promise. This is not inconsistent with <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,15);">Gal 3:15</a>, "No man addeth thereto"; for there the kind of <i>addition</i> meant, and therefore denied, is one that would add <i>new conditions,</i> inconsistent with the grace of the covenant of promise. The law, though misunderstood by the Judaizers as doing so, was really added for a different purpose, namely, "because of (or as the <i>Greek,</i> 'for the sake of') the transgressions," that is, to bring out into clearer view <i>the transgressions</i> of it (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',7,'7-9');">Rom 7:7-9</a>); to make men more fully conscious of their "sins," by being perceived as <i>transgressions of the law,</i> and so to make them long for the promised Saviour. This accords with <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,23,24);">Gal 3:23-24</a>;<a onclick="return mV('Rom',4,15);">Rom 4:15</a>. The meaning can hardly be "<i>to check</i> transgressions," for the law rather stimulates the corrupt heart to disobey it (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',5,20);">Rom 5:20</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Rom',7,13);">7:13</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>till the seed</b>—<i>during the period up to the time when the</i> seed came. The law was a preparatory dispensation for the Jewish nation (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',5,20);">Rom 5:20</a>; <i>Greek,</i> "the law came in <i>additionally</i> and <i>incidentally</i>"), intervening between the promise and its fulfilment in Christ.
|
|
<br><br><b>come</b>—(Compare "faith <i>came,</i>" <a href= "#" onclick="return mV('Gal',3,23);">Gal 3:23</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>the promise</b>— (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',4,21);">Rom 4:21</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>ordained</b>—<i>Greek,</i> "constituted" or "disposed."
|
|
<br><br><b>by angels</b>—as the <i>instrumental enactors</i> of the law [ALFORD] God delegated the law to angels as something rather alien to Him and severe (<a onclick="return mV('Act',7,53);">Act 7:53</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Hbr',2,2,3);">Hbr 2:2-3</a>; compare <a onclick="return mV('Deu',33,2);">Deu 33:2</a>, "He came with ten thousands of saints," that is, angels, <a onclick="return mV('Psa',68,17);">Psa 68:17</a>). He reserved "the promise" to Himself and dispensed it according to His own goodness.
|
|
<br><br><b>in the hand of a mediator</b>—namely, Moses. <a onclick="return mV('Deu',5,5);">Deu 5:5</a>, "I stood <i>between</i> the Lord and you": the very definition of a mediator. Hence the phrase often recurs, "By the hand of Moses." In the giving of the law, the "angels" were representatives of God; Moses, as mediator, represented the people.
|
|
<p id="Ga3_20"><b>20.</b> "Now a mediator cannot be of one (but must be of <i>two</i> parties whom he mediates between); but God is one" (not two: owing to His essential <i>unity</i> not admitting of an intervening party between Him and those to be blessed; but as the ONE Sovereign, His own representative, giving the blessing <i>directly</i> by <i>promise</i> to Abraham, and, in its fulfilment, to Christ, "the Seed," without new condition, and without a mediator such as the law had). The conclusion understood is, <i>Therefore a mediator cannot appertain to God;</i> and consequently, the law, with its inseparable appendage of a mediator, cannot be the normal way of dealing of God, the one, and unchangeable God, who dealt with Abraham by <i>direct</i> promise, as a sovereign, not as one forming a compact with another party, with conditions and a mediator attached thereto. God would bring man into immediate communion with Him, and not have man separated from Him by a mediator that keeps back from access, as Moses and the legal priesthood did (<a onclick="return mV('Exd',19,12,13,17,'21-24');">Exd 19:12-13, 17, 21-24</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Hbr',12,'19-24');">Hbr 12:19-24</a>). The law that thus interposed a mediator and conditions between man and God, was an exceptional state limited to the Jews, and parenthetically preparatory to the Gospel, God's normal mode of dealing, as He dealt with Abraham, namely, <i>face to face directly;</i> by <i>promise</i> and <i>grace,</i> and not conditions; <i>to all nations united</i> by faith <i>in the one seed</i> (<a onclick="return mV('Eph',2,14,16,18);">Eph 2:14, 16, 18</a>), and not to one people to the exclusion and severance from the ONE common Father, of all other nations. It is no objection to this view, that the Gospel, too, has a mediator (<a onclick="return mV('1Ti',2,5);">1Ti 2:5</a>). For Jesus is not a mediator separating the two parties in the covenant of promise or grace, as Moses did, but ONE in both nature and office with both <i>God</i> and <i>man</i> (compare "God in Christ," <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,17);">Gal 3:17</a>): representing the whole universal manhood (<a onclick="return mV('1Cr',15,22,45,47);">1Cr 15:22, 45, 47</a>), and also bearing in Him "all the fulness of the Godhead." Even His mediatorial office is to cease when its purpose of reconciling all things to God shall have been accomplished (<a onclick="return mV('1Cr',15,24);">1Cr 15:24</a>); and God's ONENESS (<a onclick="return mV('Zec',14,9);">Zec 14:9</a>), as "all in all," shall be fully manifested. Compare <a onclick="return mV('Jhn',1,17);">Jhn 1:17</a>, where the two mediators—Moses, the severing mediator of legal conditions, and Jesus, the uniting mediator of grace—are contrasted. The Jews began their worship by reciting the <i>Schemah,</i> opening thus, "Jehovah our God is ONE Jehovah"; which words their Rabbis (as JARCHIUS) interpret as teaching not only the unity of God, but the future <i>universality of His Kingdom</i> on earth (<a onclick="return mV('Zep',3,9);">Zep 3:9</a> ). Paul (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',3,30);">Rom 3:30</a>) infers the same truth from the ONENESS of God (compare <a onclick="return mV('Eph',4,'4-6');">Eph 4:4-6</a>). He, as being One, unites all believers, without distinction, to Himself (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,8,16, 28);">Gal 3:8, 16, 28</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Eph',1,10);">Eph 1:10</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Eph',2,14);">2:14</a>; compare <a onclick="return mV('Hbr',2,11);">Hbr 2:11</a>) in direct communion. The unity of God involves the unity of the people of God, and also His dealing directly without intervention of a mediator.
|
|
<p id="Ga3_21"><b>21.</b> "Is the <i>law</i> (which involves a mediator) against the promises of God (which are without a mediator, and <i>rest on God</i> alone and immediately)? God forbid."
|
|
<br><br><b>life</b>—The law, as an externally prescribed rule, can never internally impart spiritual life to men naturally dead in sin, and change the disposition. If the law had been a law capable of giving <i>life,</i> "verily (in very reality, and not in the mere fancy of legalists) righteousness would have been by the law (for where life is, there righteousness, its <i>condition,</i> must also be)." But the law does not <i>pretend</i> to give life, and therefore not righteousness; so there is no opposition between the law and the promise. Righteousness can only come through the promise to Abraham, and through its fulfilment in the Gospel of grace.
|
|
<p id="Ga3_22"><b>22. But</b>—as the law cannot give life or righteousness [ALFORD]. Or the "But" means, So far is <i>righteousness</i> from being of the law, that the <i>knowledge of sin</i> is rather what comes of the law [BENGEL].
|
|
<br><br><b>the scripture</b>—which began to be written after the time of the promise, at the time when the law was given. The <i>written</i> letter was needed SO as PERMANENTLY to convict man of disobedience to God's command. Therefore he says, "the Scripture," not the "Law." Compare <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,8);">Gal 3:8</a>, "Scripture," for "the God of the Scripture."
|
|
<br><br><b>concluded</b>—"shut up," under condemnation, as in a prison. Compare <a onclick="return mV('Isa',24,22);">Isa 24:22</a>, "As prisoners gathered in the pit and shut up in the prison." Beautifully contrasted with "the liberty wherewith Christ makes free," which follows, <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,7,9,25,26);">Gal 3:7, 9, 25-26</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Gal', 5,1);">5:1</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Isa',61,1);">Isa 61:1</a>.
|
|
<br><br><b>all</b>—<i>Greek</i> neuter, "the universe of things": the whole world, man, and all that appertains to him.
|
|
<br><br><b>under sin</b>— (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',3,9, 19);">Rom 3:9, 19</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Rom',11,32);">11:32</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>the promise</b>—<i>the inheritance promised</i> (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,18);">Gal 3:18</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>by faith of Jesus Christ</b>—that is which is by faith in Jesus Christ.
|
|
<br><br><b>might be given</b>—The emphasis is on "given": that it might be a free <i>gift;</i> not something earned by the works of the law (<a href= "#" onclick="return mV('Rom',6,23);">Rom 6:23</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>to them that believe</b>—to them that have "the faith of (in) Jesus Christ" just spoken of.
|
|
<p id="Ga3_23"><b>23. faith</b>—namely, that just mentioned (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,22);">Gal 3:22</a>), of which Christ is the object.
|
|
<br><br><b>kept</b>—<i>Greek,</i> "kept in ward": the effect of the "shutting up" (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,22);">Gal 3:22</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Gal',4,2);">Gal 4:2</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Rom',7,6);">Rom 7:6</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>unto</b>—"with a view to the faith," etc. We were, in a manner, morally forced to it, so that there remained to us no refuge but faith. Compare the phrase, <a onclick="return mV('Psa',78,50);">Psa 78:50</a>, <i>Margin;</i> <a onclick="return mV('Psa',31,8);">Psa 31:8</a>.
|
|
<br><br><b>which should afterwards,</b> etc.—"which was afterwards to be revealed."
|
|
<p id="Ga3_24"><b>24.</b> "<i>So that</i> the law <i>hath been</i> (that is, hath <i>turned out to be</i>) our schoolmaster (or "tutor," literally, "pedagogue": this term, among the Greeks, meant a faithful servant entrusted with the care of the boy from childhood to puberty, to keep him from evil, physical and moral, and accompany him to his amusements and studies) to guide us unto Christ," with whom we are no longer "shut up" in bondage, but are freemen. "Children" (literally, <i>infants</i>) need such <i>tutoring</i> (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',4,3);">Gal 4:3</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>might be</b>—rather, "that we <i>may</i> be justified by faith"; which we could not be till Christ, the object of faith, had come. Meanwhile the law, by outwardly checking the sinful propensity which was constantly giving fresh proof of its refractoriness—as thus the consciousness of the power of the sinful principle became more vivid, and hence the sense of need both of forgiveness of sin and freedom from its bondage was awakened—the law became a "schoolmaster to guide us unto Christ" [NEANDER]. The <i>moral</i> law shows us what we ought to do, and so we learn our inability to do it. In the <i>ceremonial</i> law we seek, by animal sacrifices, to answer for our not having done it, but find dead victims no satisfaction for the sins of living men, and that outward purifying will not cleanse the soul; and that therefore we need an infinitely better Sacrifice, the antitype of all the legal sacrifices. Thus delivered up to the <i>judicial</i> law, we see how awful is the doom we deserve: thus the law at last leads us to Christ, with whom we find righteousness and peace. "<i>Sin, sin!</i> is the word heard again and again in the Old Testament. Had it not there for centuries rung in the ear, and fastened on the conscience, the joyful sound, "grace for grace," would not have been the watchword of the New Testament. This was the end of the whole system of sacrifices" [THOLUCK].
|
|
<p id="Ga3_25"><b>25.</b> "But <i>now that</i> faith is come," etc. Moses the lawgiver cannot bring us into the heavenly Canaan though he can bring us to the border of it. At that point he is superseded by Joshua, the type of Jesus, who leads the true Israel into their inheritance. The law leads us to Christ, and there its office ceases.
|
|
<p id="Ga3_26"><b>26. children</b>—<i>Greek,</i> "sons."
|
|
<br><br><b>by</b>—<i>Greek,</i> "<i>through</i> faith." "Ye all" (Jews and Gentiles alike) are no longer "children" requiring a <i>tutor,</i> but SONS emancipated and walking at liberty.
|
|
<p id="Ga3_27"><b>27. baptized into Christ</b>— (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',6,3);">Rom 6:3</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>have put on Christ</b>—Ye <i>did, in that very act</i> of being baptized into Christ, <i>put on,</i> or clothe yourselves with, Christ: so the <i>Greek</i> expresses. Christ is to you the <i>toga virilis</i> (the Roman garment of the full-grown man, assumed when ceasing to be a child) [BENGEL]. GATAKER defines a Christian, "One who has put on Christ." The argument is, By baptism ye have put on Christ; and therefore, He being the Son of God, ye become sons by adoption, by virtue of His Sonship by generation. This proves that baptism, <i>where it answers to its ideal,</i> is not a mere empty sign, but a means of spiritual transference from the state of legal condemnation to that of living union with Christ, and of sonship through Him in relation to God (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',13,14);">Rom 13:14</a>). Christ alone can, by baptizing with His Spirit, make the inward grace correspond to the outward sign. But as He promises the blessing in the faithful use of the means, the Church has rightly presumed, in charity, that such is the case, nothing appearing to the contrary.
|
|
<p id="Ga3_28"><b>28.</b> There is in this sonship by faith in Christ, no class privileged above another, as the Jews under the law had been above the Gentiles (<a onclick="return mV('Rom',10,12);">Rom 10:12</a>; <a onclick="return mV('1Cr',12,13);">1Cr 12:13</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Col',3,11);">Col 3:11</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>bond nor free</b>—Christ alike belongs to both by faith; whence he puts "bond" <i>before</i> "free." Compare <i>Note,</i> see on JFB for <a href="./Comm/jfb/1Cr/1Cr007.html#a1Co7_21">1Co 7:21</a>, <a href="./Comm/jfb/1Cr/1Cr007.html#a1Co7_22">1Co 7:22</a>; JFB for <a href="./Comm/jfb/Eph/Eph006.html#Eph6_8">Eph 6:8</a>.
|
|
<br><br><b>neither male nor female</b>—rather, as <i>Greek,</i> "there is <i>not</i> male <i>and</i> female." There is no distinction into male and female. Difference of sex makes no difference in Christian privileges. But under the law the male sex had great privileges. Males alone had in their body circumcision, the sign of the covenant (contrast <i>baptism</i> applied to male and female alike); they alone were capable of being kings and priests, whereas all of either sex are now "kings and priests unto God" (<a onclick="return mV('Rev',1,6);">Rev 1:6</a>); they had prior right to inheritances. In the resurrection the relation of the sexes shall cease (<a onclick="return mV('Luk',20,35);">Luk 20:35</a>).
|
|
<br><br><b>one</b>—<i>Greek,</i> "one man"; masculine, not neuter, namely "one new man" in Christ (<a onclick="return mV('Eph',2,15);">Eph 2:15</a>).
|
|
<p id="Ga3_29"><b>29. and heirs</b>—The oldest manuscripts omit "and." Christ is "Abraham's seed" (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,16);">Gal 3:16</a>): ye are "one in Christ" (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,28);">Gal 3:28</a>), and one with Christ, as having "put on Christ" (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,27);">Gal 3:27</a>); therefore YE are "Abraham's seed," which is tantamount to saying (whence the "and" is omitted), ye are "heirs according to the <i>promise</i>" (not "by the <i>law,</i>" <a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,18);">Gal 3:18</a>); for it was to Abraham's seed that the inheritance was promised (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,16);">Gal 3:16</a>). Thus he arrives at the same truth which he set out with (<a onclick="return mV('Gal',3,7);">Gal 3:7</a>). But one new "seed" of a righteous succession could be found. One single faultless grain of human nature was found by God Himself, the source of a new and imperishable seed: "the seed" (<a onclick="return mV('Psa',22,30);">Psa 22:30</a>) who receive from Him a new nature and name (<a onclick="return mV('Gen',3,15);">Gen 3:15</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Isa',53,10,11);">Isa 53:10-11</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Jhn',12,24);">Jhn 12:24</a>). In Him the lineal descent from David becomes extinct. He died without posterity. But He lives and shall reign on David's throne. No one has a legal claim to sit upon it but Himself, He being the only living direct representative (<a onclick="return mV('Eze',21,27);">Eze 21:27</a>). His spiritual seed derive their birth from the travail of His soul, being born again of His word, which is the incorruptible seed (<a onclick="return mV('Jhn',1,12);">Jhn 1:12</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Rom',9,8);">Rom 9:8</a>; <a onclick="return mV('1Pe',1,23);">1Pe 1:23</a>).
|
|
</div></div><div class="return"><a href="#top">Return to Top</a></div>
|
|
<script src="./js/MainFooter.js" type="text/javascript"></script> |