100 lines
24 KiB
HTML
100 lines
24 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
|
|
<html><head>
|
|
<title>Blue Letter Bible: Text Commentaries</title>
|
|
<script src="../../../js/basepath.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
|
|
<script src="./js/nav.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
|
|
<script src="./js/MainHeader.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
|
|
<script>
|
|
currentBook = 'Jam';
|
|
currentChapter = 2;
|
|
PriorBook = 'Hebrews';
|
|
PriorBookURL = './Comm/david_guzik/sg/Hbr_1.html';
|
|
PriorChapter = 'James 1';
|
|
PriorChapterURL = './Comm/david_guzik/sg/Jam_1.html';
|
|
NextBook = '1 Peter';
|
|
NextBookURL = './Comm/david_guzik/sg/1Pe_1.html';
|
|
NextChapter = 'James 3';
|
|
NextChapterURL = './Comm/david_guzik/sg/Jam_3.html';
|
|
Title = 'Study Guide for James 2';
|
|
</script>
|
|
<script src="./js/Comms/DG.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
|
|
<h2><a onclick="return mV('Jam',2,'all');">Jam 2</a> - A Living Faith in the Life of the Church</h2>
|
|
<p>A. Partiality and discrimination in the family of God.</p>
|
|
<p class="c1">1. (<a onclick="return mV('Jam',2,1);">1</a>) The principle established.</p>
|
|
<p class="c2"><span>My brethren, do not hold the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, <i>the Lord </i>of glory, with partiality.</span></p>
|
|
<p class="c4">a. The glorious <b><span class="c3">faith</span></b> we have, the <b><span class="c3">faith of our Lord Jesus Christ</span></b>, should never be associated <b><span class="c3">with partiality</span></b> (discrimination). The <b><span class="c3">Lord of glory</span></b> Himself shows no partiality (<a onclick="return mV('Deu',10,17);">Deu 10:17</a>; <a onclick="return mV('Act',10,34);">Act 10:34</a>), so neither should those who put their trust in Him.</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">b. We do well to remember that James wrote to a very "partial" age, filled with prejudice and hatred based on class, ethnicity, nationality, and religious background. In the ancient world people were routinely and permanently categorized because they were Jew or Gentile, slave or free, rich or poor, Greek or barbarian, or whatever.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">i. A significant aspect of the work of Jesus was to break down these walls that divided humanity, and to bring forth one new race of mankind in Him (<a onclick="return mV('Eph',2,'14-15');">Eph 2:14-15</a>).</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">c. The unity and openness of the early church was an astonishment to the ancient world. But this unity didn't come automatically. As this command from James shows, the apostles had to teach the early church to never <b><span class="c3">hold the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ...with partiality</span></b>.</p>
|
|
<p class="c1">2. (<a onclick="return mV('Jam',2,'2-4');">2-4</a>) An example of the kind of partiality that has no place among Christians.</p>
|
|
<p class="c2"><span>For if there should come into your assembly a man with gold rings, in fine apparel, and there should also come in a poor man in filthy clothes, and you pay attention to the one wearing the fine clothes and say to him, "You sit here in a good place," and say to the poor man, "You stand there," or, "Sit here at my footstool," have you not shown partiality among yourselves, and become judges with evil thoughts?</span></p>
|
|
<p class="c4">a. <b><span class="c3">If there should come into your assembly</span></b>: In the ancient Greek, the word <b><span class="c3">assembly</span></b> is literally <i>synagogue</i>, the name of the meeting place for Jews. The fact that James calls a <i>Christian</i> meeting place a <i>synagogue</i> shows that he wrote before Gentiles were widely received into the church. At the time James wrote, most all Christians came from a Jewish heritage. This is the only place in the New Testament where an <b><span class="c3">assembly</span></b> of Christians is clearly called a <i>synagogue</i>.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">i. "Till the final rift between Judaism and Christianity both Christian and non-Christian Jews used, at least often, the same word for their sacred meeting-place." (Adamson)</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">b. <b><span class="c3">A man with gold rings</span></b>: This showed the man was rich. "In Roman society the wealthy wore rings on their left hand in great profusion. A sign of wealth, rings were worn with great ostentation. </p>
|
|
<p class="c4">There were even shops in Rome where rings could be rented for special occasions." (Hiebert)</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">c. <b><span class="c3">Have you not shown partiality among yourselves, and become judges with evil thoughts?</span></b> To favor the <b><span class="c3">rich man</span></b> over the <b><span class="c3">poor man</span></b> in the way James describes shows a deep carnality among Christians.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">i. It shows that we care more for the outward appearance than we do upon the heart. For the Lord does not see as man sees; for man looks at the outward appearance, but the <span class="c6">Lord</span> looks at the heart<span> (<a onclick="return mV('1Sa',16,7);">1Sa 16:7</a>). </span>God looks at the heart, and so should we.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">ii. It shows that we misunderstand who is important and blessed in the sight of God. When we assume that the rich man is more important to God, or more blessed by God, we put too much value in material riches.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">iii. It shows a selfish streak in us. Usually we favor the <b><span class="c3">rich man</span></b> over the <b><span class="c3">poor man</span></b> because we believe we can get more from the <b><span class="c3">rich man</span></b>. He can do favors for us that the <b><span class="c3">poor man</span></b> can't.</p>
|
|
<p class="c1">3. (<a onclick="return mV('Jam',2,'5-7');">5-7</a>) Man's partiality rarely agrees with God's heart.</p>
|
|
<p class="c2"><span>Listen, my beloved brethren: Has God not chosen the poor of this world <i>to be </i>rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom which He promised to those who love Him? But you have dishonored the poor man. Do not the rich oppress you and drag you into the courts? Do they not blaspheme that noble name by which you are called?</span></p>
|
|
<p class="c4">a. <b><span class="c3">Has God not chosen the poor of this world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom</span></b><span>: </span>Though it is easy for man to be partial to the rich, God isn't partial to them. In fact, since riches are an obstacle to the kingdom of God (<a onclick="return mV('Mat',19,24);">Mat 19:24</a>), there is a sense in which the poor of this world are specially blessed by God. </p>
|
|
<p class="c5">i. They are <b><span class="c3">chosen...to be rich in faith</span></b> because the <b><span class="c3">poor of this world</span></b> simply have more opportunities to trust God. Therefore they may be far more <b><span class="c3">rich in faith</span></b> than the rich man.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">ii. They are <b><span class="c3">chosen...heirs of the kingdom</span></b>, because Jesus said that being rich made it <i>harder</i> to enter into the kingdom of heaven (<a onclick="return mV('Mat',19,24);">Mat 19:24</a>).</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">b. <b><span class="c3">Has not God chosen</span></b>: In the sense that the poor more readily respond to God in faith, having fewer obstacles to the kingdom, we can see how <b><span class="c3">God</span></b> has <b><span class="c3">chosen</span></b> the poor. "Church history demonstrates that comparatively more poor people than rich have responded to the gospel." (Hiebert)</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">i. When we choose people by what we can see on the surface, we miss the mind of God. Remember that Judas <i>appeared</i> to be much better leadership material than Peter.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">ii. Of course, God has not <i>only</i> <b><span class="c3">chosen the poor</span></b>. But we may say that He has <b><span class="c3">chosen the poor</span></b> first, in the sense Paul speaks of in <a onclick="return mV('1Cr',1,26);">1Cr 1:26</a>: <i>For you see your calling, brethren, that not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called<span>.</span></i> Calvin also writes regarding God's choice of the poor: "Not indeed alone, but he wished to begin with them, that he might beat down the pride of the rich."</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">c. <b><span class="c3">Do not the rich oppress you and drag you into the courts?</span></b> James reminds his readers that the rich often sin against them, often because the love of money is the root of kinds of evil (<a onclick="return mV('1Ti',6,10);">1Ti 6:10</a>). For this reason alone, the rich are not worthy of the partiality often shown to them.</p>
|
|
<p class="c1">4. (<a onclick="return mV('Jam',2,'8-9');">8-9</a>) Partiality is condemned by the Scriptures.</p>
|
|
<p class="c2"><span>If you really fulfill <i>the </i>royal law according to the Scripture, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself," you do well; but if you show partiality, you commit sin, and are convicted by the law as transgressors.</span></p>
|
|
<p class="c4">a. <b><span class="c3">If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture</span></b><span>:</span> James anticipates that some of his readers might defend their partiality to the rich as simply loving him as their neighbor in obedience to the law. </p>
|
|
<p class="c4">b. <b><span class="c3">If you show partiality, you commit sin</span></b>: The problem isn't that you are nice to the rich. The problem is that you <b><span class="c3">show partiality</span></b> to the rich, and are not nice to the poor man! So you can't excuse your <b><span class="c3">partiality</span></b> by saying, "I'm just fulfilling the command to love my neighbor as myself."</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">c. <b><span class="c3">The royal law</span></b>: Our God is a great King, and His law is a <b><span class="c3">royal law</span></b>. Our King Jesus put special emphasis on this command (<a onclick="return mV('Mat',22,'36-40');">Mat 22:36-40</a>) from the Old Testament (<a onclick="return mV('Lev',19,18);">Lev 19:18</a>). James is reminding us that the poor man is just as much our <b><span class="c3">neighbor</span></b> as the rich man is.</p>
|
|
<p class="c1">5. (<a onclick="return mV('Jam',2,'10-13');">10-13</a>) The serious matter of obeying all of God's commands.</p>
|
|
<p class="c2"><span>For whoever shall keep the whole law, and yet stumble in one <i>point, </i>he is guilty of all. For He who said, "Do not commit adultery," also said, "Do not murder." Now if you do not commit adultery, but you do murder, you have become a transgressor of the law. So speak and so do as those who will be judged by the law of liberty. For judgment is without mercy to the one who has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment.</span></p>
|
|
<p class="c4">a. <b><span class="c3">Whoever shall keep the whole law, and yet stumble in one point, he is guilty of all</span></b><span>: </span>James here guards us against a selective obedience, the sort that will pick and choose which commands of God should be obeyed and which could be safely disregarded.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">i. We can't say, "I like God's command against murder, so I'll keep that one. But I don't like His command against adultery, so I will disregard it." God cares about the <b><span class="c3">whole law</span></b>.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">ii. The <b><span class="c3">whole law</span></b> must be kept if one will be justified by the law. One ancient Rabbi taught: "If a man perform all the commandments, save one, he is guilty of all and each; to break one precept is to defy God who commanded the whole." (Adamson)</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">b. <b><span class="c3">So speak and so do as those who will be judged by the law of liberty</span></b>: We are under the <b><span class="c3">law of liberty</span></b>. It has <b><span class="c3">liberty</span></b>, yet it is still a <b><span class="c3">law</span></b> that must be obeyed and that we will be judged by at the judgment seat of Christ (<a onclick="return mV('2Cr',5,10);">2Cr 5:10</a>).</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">c. <b><span class="c3">For judgment is without mercy to the one who has shown no mercy</span></b>: As those who <b><span class="c3">will be judged by the law of liberty</span></b>, we should always show <b><span class="c3">mercy</span></b> to others by refraining from partiality. The mercy we show will be extended to us again on the day of judgment, and that <b><span class="c3">mercy triumphs over judgment</span></b>.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">i. James is relating another principle of Jesus from the Sermon on the Mount: <i>For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you</i><span>. (<a onclick="return mV('Mat',7,2);">Mat 7:2</a>)</span></p>
|
|
<p>B. The demonstration of a living faith in loving action.</p>
|
|
<p class="c1">1. (<a onclick="return mV('Jam',2,14);">14</a>) The principle established: true faith will be accompainied by action.</p>
|
|
<p class="c2"><span>What <i>does it </i>profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him?</span></p>
|
|
<p class="c4">a. <b><span class="c3">Someone says he has faith but does not have works</span></b>: James thinks it impossible that someone can genuinely have saving faith with no works. But someone can <i>say </i><b><span class="c3">he has faith</span></b>, but fail to show forth good works. So, the question is valid: can <i>that kind</i> of <b><span class="c3">faith save him</span></b>?</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">b. James wrote to Christians from a Jewish background who discovered the glory of salvation by faith. They knew the exhilaration of freedom from works-righteousness. But they then went to the other extreme of thinking that <b><span class="c3">works</span></b> didn't matter at all.</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">c. James does not contradict Paul, who insisted that we are saved <i>not of works</i> (<a onclick="return mV('Eph',2,9);">Eph 2:9</a>). James merely clarifies for us the <i>kind of faith that saves</i>. We are saved by grace through faith, not by works; but saving faith will have works that accompany it. As the saying goes: <i>faith alone saves, but the faith that saves is not alone</i> - it has good works with it.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">i. Paul also understood the necessity of works in proving the character of our faith. He wrote: <i>For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them</i> (<a onclick="return mV('Eph',2,10);">Eph 2:10</a>). He also wrote: <i>This is a faithful saying, and these things I want you to affirm constantly, that those who have believed in God should be careful to maintain good works.</i> (<a onclick="return mV('Tts',3,8);">Tts 3:8</a>)</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">ii. The great reformer and champion of salvation by grace through faith alone, John Calvin, understood James' point: "But James has quite another thing in view, even to shew that he who professes that he has faith, must prove the reality of his faith by his works. Doubtless James did not mean to teach us here the ground on which our hope of salvation ought to rest; and it is this alone that Paul dwells upon." (Calvin)</p>
|
|
<p class="c1">2. (<a onclick="return mV('Jam',2,'15-17');">15-17</a>) An example of dead faith.</p>
|
|
<p class="c2"><span>If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food, and one of you says to them, "Depart in peace, be warmed and filled," but you do not give them the things which are needed for the body, what <i>does it </i>profit? Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.</span></p>
|
|
<p class="c4">a. <b><span class="c3">If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food</span></b><span>: </span>To fail in the most simple good work towards a brother or sister in need demonstrates that one does not have a living faith, and we can only be saved by a living faith in Jesus.</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">b. <b><span class="c3">Be warmed and filled</span></b>: To say this means you know that the person in front of you <i>needs</i> clothing and food. You know their need well, but offer nothing to help them except a few religious words.</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">c. <b><span class="c3">What does it profit?</span></b> Real faith, and the works that accompany it, are not made up of only "spiritual" things, but also of a concern for the most basic needs - such as the need for comfort, covering, and food. When needs arise, we should sometimes <i>pray</i> less, and simply <i>do more</i> to help the person in need. We can sometimes <i>pray</i> as a substitute for <i>action</i>.</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">d. <b><span class="c3">Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead</span></b><span>: This is the first time James speaks of a <b><span class="c3">dead</span></b></span> faith. Faith alone saves us, but it must be a <i>living faith</i>. We can tell if faith is <i>alive</i> by seeing if it is accompanied by <b><span class="c3">works</span></b>, and <b><span class="c3">if it does not have works</span></b>, it <b><span class="c3">is dead</span></b>.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">i. A <i>living faith</i> is simply <i>real faith</i>. If we really believe something, we will follow through and act upon it. If we really put our trust and faith on Jesus, we will care for the <b><span class="c3">naked and destitute</span></b> as He told us to.</p>
|
|
<p class="c1">3. (<a onclick="return mV('Jam',2,'18-19');">18-19</a>) A living faith cannot be separated from works.</p>
|
|
<p class="c2"><span>But someone will say, "You have faith, and I have works." Show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my works. You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe; and tremble!</span></p>
|
|
<p class="c4">a. <b><span class="c3">You have faith, and I have works</span></b>: Some might try to say that some have the "gift" of <b><span class="c3">works</span></b> and others have the "gift" of <b><span class="c3">faith</span></b>. "It's fine for you to have your gift of <b><span class="c3">works</span></b> and that you care for the needy. But that isn't my gift."<b><span class="c3"> </span></b>But James will have none of this kind of thinking. Real faith will be demonstrated by works.</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">b. <b><span class="c3">Show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my works</span></b><span>: </span>The appeal of James is clear and logical. We can't "see" someone's faith, but we <i>can</i> see their works. You can't see faith <b><span class="c3">without</span></b> works, but you can demonstrate the reality of faith <b><span class="c3">by</span></b> works.</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">c. <b><span class="c3">You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe; and tremble!</span></b> The fallacy of faith without works is demonstrated by the <b><span class="c3">demons</span></b>, who have a "dead" faith in God. The demons <b><span class="c3">believe</span></b> in the sense that they acknowledge that God exists. But this "faith" does nothing for the <b><span class="c3">demons</span></b>, because it isn't real faith, proved by the fact that it doesn't have works with it.</p>
|
|
<p class="c1">4. (<a onclick="return mV('Jam',2,'20-24');">20-24</a>) Abraham as an example of living faith.</p>
|
|
<p class="c2"><span>But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead? Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered Isaac his son on the altar? Do you see that faith was working together with his works, and by works faith was made perfect? And the Scripture was fulfilled which says, "Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness." And he was called the friend of God. You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only.</span></p>
|
|
<p class="c4">a. <b><span class="c3">Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered Isaac his son on the altar?</span></b> Abraham was justified by faith long before he offered Isaac (<a onclick="return mV('Gen',15,6);">Gen 15:6</a>). But his obedience in offering Isaac <i>demonstrated</i> that he really did trust God. </p>
|
|
<p class="c4">b. <b><span class="c3">Faith was working together with his works, and by works faith was made perfect</span></b><span>: Faith and works cooperated perfectly together in Abraham. If he never had believed God, he could have never done the good work of obedience when asked to offer Isaac. As well, his faith was shown to be true - was completed, <b><span class="c3">was made perfect</span></b></span> - by his obedient works.</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">c. <b><span class="c3">You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith </span><span class="c3">only</span></b>: The <b><span class="c3">faith only</span></b> that will not justify a man is a faith that is without works, a dead faith. But true faith, living faith, shown to be true by good works, will alone justify.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">i. "But James has quite another thing in view, even to shew that he who professes that he has faith, must prove the reality of his faith by his works. Doubtless James did not mean to teach us here the ground on which our hope of salvation ought to rest; and it is this alone that Paul dwells upon." (Calvin)</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">d. Works <i>must</i> accompany a genuine faith, because genuine faith is always connected with regeneration - being born again, becoming a <i>new creation</i> in Jesus (<a onclick="return mV('2Cr',5,17);">2Cr 5:17</a>). If there is no evidence of a new life, there was no genuine, saving faith.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">i. As Charles Spurgeon is reported to have said: "The grace that does not change my life will not save my soul."</p>
|
|
<p class="c1">5. (<a onclick="return mV('Jam',2,'25-26');">25-26</a>) Rahab as an example of living faith.</p>
|
|
<p class="c2"><span>Likewise, was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works when she received the messengers and sent <i>them </i>out another way? For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.</span></p>
|
|
<p class="c4">a. <b><span class="c3">Was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works</span></b><span>: </span>Rahab demonstrated her trust in the God of Israel by hiding the spies and seeking salvation from their God (<a onclick="return mV('Jos',2,'8-13');">Jos 2:8-13</a>). Her faith was shown to be living faith because it <i>did</i> something. Her belief in the God of Israel would not have saved her if she had not <i>done</i> something with that faith.</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">b. Significantly, James uses two examples of a living faith: Abraham (the father of the Jews) and Rahab (a Gentile). James perhaps is subtly rebuking the partiality that may have developed on the part of Jewish Christians against the Gentile believers starting to come into the church.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">i. The lesson from Abraham is clear: if we believe in God, we will do what He tells us to do. The lesson from Rahab is also clear: if we believe in God, we will help His people, even at our own expense.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">ii. "He designedly put together two persons so different in their character, in order more clearly to shew, that no one, whatever may have been his or her condition, nation, or class in society, has ever been counted righteous without good works." (Calvin, cited in Hiebert)</p>
|
|
<p class="c4">c. <b><span class="c3">For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also</span></b><span>: </span>As much as you can have a body with no life (a corpse), so you can have a faith with no life - and faith without works is a <b><span class="c3">dead</span></b> faith, unable to save.</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">i. "Therefore, if no deeds are forthcoming, it is proof that the professed faith is dead. Notice that James does not deny that it is faith. He simply indicates that it is not the right kind of faith. It is not living faith, nor can it save." (Burdick)</p>
|
|
<p class="c5">ii. "Man is not justified by faith alone, that is, by a bare and empty knowledge of God; he is justified by works, that is, his righteousness is known and proved by its fruits." (Calvin)</p>
|
|
<script src="./js/Comms/DG_Footer.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
|
|
<script src="./js/MainFooter.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
|